For a moment, consider the implications of this statement. When single, I've found many women treat themselves differently than attached. Sexuality and self-worth are not contingent upon Facebook status, but instead, should persist at all times.
Why is lingerie so often thought to be for partnered women or women on the prowl? Perhaps that's why it is often despised by feminists. In the early 20th century, bras were a source of freedom for women. Corsets had been the prior standard. In the time of first wave feminism, bras were a welcome alternative, allowing for greater physical movement, including the ability to participate in sports.
 |
| Image credit: bobster1985 |
Second wave feminism brought unique challenges to lingerie, as its focus centered in more in de facto equality than de jure. Advocating social equality in the home and workplace meant treating biologically different genders the same, which required feminists to understand or at least theorize on the differences between men and women.
While attempting to minimize the differences between men and women, I believe much was gained, but something was also lost, the ability to have pride in our genders and sexualities. To varying degrees, we have breasts and vaginas, and all the 'power suits' in the world can't change this.
A matching bra and panty set that fits well and makes you feel beautiful offers far more than the potential for others sexual arousal. Lingerie can also be a gift for yourself, a secret offering to the goddess you are. Being proud of your sensual self and feminine form. I find it is invigorating to dress for a career, earn the salary the I deserve while finding intimate ways to maintain a connection to my sexuality.
In sum, I advocate loving your tits and your vulva, and if wrapping them up in lace helps, do it.
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment